linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -next] powerpc: kernel/time.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:19:58 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        kernelfans@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] powerpc: kernel/time.c - cleanup warnings

Hi Alexandre,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:18 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On 23/03/2021 05:12:57-0400, He Ying wrote:
> > We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
> > warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > warning: symbol 'dtl_consumer' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Declare 'decrementer_max' and 'rtc_lock' in powerpc asm/time.h.
> > Rename 'rtc_lock' in drviers/rtc/rtc-vr41xx.c to 'vr41xx_rtc_lock' to
> > avoid the conflict with the variable in powerpc asm/time.h.
> > Move 'dtl_consumer' definition behind "include <asm/dtl.h>" because it
> > is declared there.
> >
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Instead of including linux/mc146818rtc.h in powerpc kernel/time.c, declare
> >   rtc_lock in powerpc asm/time.h.
> >
>
> V1 was actually the correct thing to do. rtc_lock is there exactly
> because chrp and maple are using mc146818 compatible RTCs. This is then
> useful because then drivers/char/nvram.c is enabled. The proper fix
> would be to scrap all of that and use rtc-cmos for those platforms as
> this drives the RTC properly and exposes the NVRAM for the mc146818.
>
> Or at least, if there are no users for the char/nvram driver on those
> two platforms, remove the spinlock and stop enabling CONFIG_NVRAM or
> more likely rename the symbol as it seems to be abused by both chrp and
> powermac.

IIRC, on CHRP LongTrail, NVRAM was inherited from CHRP's Mac ancestry,
not from CHRP's PC ancestry, and thus NVRAM is not the one in the
mc146818-compatible RTC.

http://users.telenet.be/geertu/Linux/PPC/DeviceTree.html confirms that,
showing that nvram is a different device node than rtc.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds