[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aRaNSaeWRA2H_q3k9+OpG0Lc3V7JWU8+whZ9s3gob-Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:15:14 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matt Morehouse <mascasa@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] perf: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on SIGTRAP
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:12 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 15:01, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > One last try, I'll leave it alone now, I promise :-)
> >
> > This looks like it does what you suggested, thanks! :-)
> >
> > I'll still need to think about it, because of the potential problem
> > with modify-signal-races and what the user's synchronization story
> > would look like then.
>
> I agree that this looks inherently racy. The attr can't be allocated
> on stack, user synchronization may be tricky and expensive. The API
> may provoke bugs and some users may not even realize the race problem.
>
> One potential alternative is use of an opaque u64 context (if we could
> shove it into the attr). A user can pass a pointer to the attr in
> there (makes it equivalent to this proposal), or bit-pack size/type
> (as we want), pass some sequence number or whatever.
Just to clarify what I was thinking about, but did not really state:
perf_event_attr_t includes u64 ctx, and we return it back to the user
in siginfo_t. Kernel does not treat it in any way. This is a pretty
common API pattern in general.
> > > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > > @@ -778,6 +778,9 @@ struct perf_event {
> > > void *security;
> > > #endif
> > > struct list_head sb_list;
> > > +
> > > + unsigned long si_uattr;
> > > + unsigned long si_data;
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
> > > };
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > @@ -5652,13 +5652,17 @@ static long _perf_ioctl(struct perf_even
> > > return perf_event_query_prog_array(event, (void __user *)arg);
> > >
> > > case PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES: {
> > > + struct perf_event_attr __user *uattr;
> > > struct perf_event_attr new_attr;
> > > - int err = perf_copy_attr((struct perf_event_attr __user *)arg,
> > > - &new_attr);
> > > + int err;
> > >
> > > + uattr = (struct perf_event_attr __user *)arg;
> > > + err = perf_copy_attr(uattr, &new_attr);
> > > if (err)
> > > return err;
> > >
> > > + event->si_uattr = (unsigned long)uattr;
> > > +
> > > return perf_event_modify_attr(event, &new_attr);
> > > }
> > > default:
> > > @@ -6399,7 +6403,12 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_eve
> > > clear_siginfo(&info);
> > > info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
> > > info.si_code = TRAP_PERF;
> > > - info.si_errno = event->attr.type;
> > > + info.si_addr = (void *)event->si_data;
> > > +
> > > + info.si_perf = event->si_uattr;
> > > + if (event->parent)
> > > + info.si_perf = event->parent->si_uattr;
> > > +
> > > force_sig_info(&info);
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -6414,8 +6423,8 @@ static void perf_pending_event_disable(s
> > > WRITE_ONCE(event->pending_disable, -1);
> > >
> > > if (event->attr.sigtrap) {
> > > - atomic_set(&event->event_limit, 1); /* rearm event */
> > > perf_sigtrap(event);
> > > + atomic_set_release(&event->event_limit, 1); /* rearm event */
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -9121,6 +9130,7 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
> > > if (events && atomic_dec_and_test(&event->event_limit)) {
> > > ret = 1;
> > > event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP;
> > > + event->si_data = data->addr;
> > >
> > > perf_event_disable_inatomic(event);
> > > }
> > > @@ -12011,6 +12021,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
> > > goto err_task;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + event->si_uattr = (unsigned long)attr_uptr;
> > > +
> > > if (is_sampling_event(event)) {
> > > if (event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT) {
> > > err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists