[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFtMnS1l7armuoZh@sashalap>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:28:45 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 104/157] mptcp: put subflow sock on connect error
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:22:29AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
>> > >
>> > > [ Upstream commit f07157792c633b528de5fc1dbe2e4ea54f8e09d4 ]
>> > >
>> > > mptcp_add_pending_subflow() performs a sock_hold() on the subflow,
>> > > then adds the subflow to the join list.
>> > >
>> > > Without a sock_put the subflow sk won't be freed in case connect() fails.
>> > >
>> > > unreferenced object 0xffff88810c03b100 (size 3000):
>> > > [..]
>> > > sk_prot_alloc.isra.0+0x2f/0x110
>> > > sk_alloc+0x5d/0xc20
>> > > inet6_create+0x2b7/0xd30
>> > > __sock_create+0x17f/0x410
>> > > mptcp_subflow_create_socket+0xff/0x9c0
>> > > __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1da/0xaf0
>> > > mptcp_pm_nl_work+0x6e0/0x1120
>> > > mptcp_worker+0x508/0x9a0
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: 5b950ff4331ddda ("mptcp: link MPC subflow into msk only after accept")
>>
>> I don't see this change in 5.10, so why is this fix queued up?
>>
>> > I have reported the following warnings and kernel crash on 5.10.26-rc2 [1]
>> > The bisect reported that issue pointing out to this commit.
>> >
>> > commit 460916534896e6d4f80a37152e0948db33376873
>> > mptcp: put subflow sock on connect error
>> >
>> > This problem is specific to 5.10.26-rc2.
>> >
>> > Warning:
>> > --------
>> > [ 1040.114695] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>> > [ 1040.119857] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 31925 at
>> > /usr/src/kernel/lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100
>> > [ 1040.129769] Modules linked in: act_mirred cls_u32 sch_netem sch_etf
>> > ip6table_nat xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat ip6table_filter xt_conntrack
>> > nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 sch_fq
>> > iptable_filter xt_mark ip_tables cls_bpf sch_ingress algif_hash
>> > x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse [last unloaded: test_blackhole_dev]
>> > [ 1040.159030] CPU: 3 PID: 31925 Comm: mptcp_connect Tainted: G
>> > W K 5.10.26-rc2 #1
>> > [ 1040.167459] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
>> > 2.2 05/23/2018
>> > [ 1040.174851] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xd7/0x100
>> >
>> > And
>> >
>> > Kernel Panic:
>> > -------------
>> > [ 1069.557485] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010
>> > [ 1069.564446] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>> > [ 1069.569583] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>> > [ 1069.574714] PGD 0 P4D 0
>> > [ 1069.577246] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>> > > index 16adba172fb9..591546d0953f 100644
>> > > --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
>> > > +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
>> > > @@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ int __mptcp_subflow_connect(struct sock *sk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
>> > > spin_lock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock);
>> > > list_add_tail(&subflow->node, &msk->join_list);
>> > > spin_unlock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock);
>> > > + sock_put(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow));
>> > >
>> > > return err;
>>
>> Crash is not surprising, the backport puts the socket in the 'success' path
>> (list_add_tail).
>>
>> I don't see why this is in -stable, the faulty commit is not there?
>>
>> The upstream patch is:
>> list_del(&subflow->node);
>> spin_unlock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock);
>> + sock_put(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow));
>>
>> [ Note the 'list_del', this is in the error unwind path ]
>
>Odd, I think something went wrong with Sasha's scripts.
I brought in the commit it depends on as a dependency for something
else, but ended up throwing it away, forgetting about this commit. Sorry
:(
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists