[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5331b4e2-eeef-1c27-5efe-bf3986fd6683@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:18:18 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"'Gustavo A. R. Silva'" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] UAPI: nfsfh.h: Replace one-element array with
flexible-array member
On 3/25/21 08:45, David Laight wrote:
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
>> Sent: 23 March 2021 22:49
>>
>> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
>> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
>> should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
>> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
>>
>> Use an anonymous union with a couple of anonymous structs in order to
>> keep userspace unchanged:
>>
>> $ pahole -C nfs_fhbase_new fs/nfsd/nfsfh.o
>> struct nfs_fhbase_new {
>> union {
>> struct {
>> __u8 fb_version_aux; /* 0 1 */
>> __u8 fb_auth_type_aux; /* 1 1 */
>> __u8 fb_fsid_type_aux; /* 2 1 */
>> __u8 fb_fileid_type_aux; /* 3 1 */
>> __u32 fb_auth[1]; /* 4 4 */
>> }; /* 0 8 */
>> struct {
>> __u8 fb_version; /* 0 1 */
>> __u8 fb_auth_type; /* 1 1 */
>> __u8 fb_fsid_type; /* 2 1 */
>> __u8 fb_fileid_type; /* 3 1 */
>> __u32 fb_auth_flex[0]; /* 4 0 */
>> }; /* 0 4 */
>> }; /* 0 8 */
>>
>> /* size: 8, cachelines: 1, members: 1 */
>> /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */
>> };
>
> Could you use the simpler:
>> struct nfs_fhbase_new {
>> __u8 fb_version;
>> __u8 fb_auth_type;
>> __u8 fb_fsid_type;
>> __u8 fb_fileid_type;
>> union {
>> __u32 fb_auth[1];
>> __u32 fb_auth_flex[0];
>> };
>> };
>
> Although I'm not certain flexible arrays are supported
> as the last element of a union.
Nope; this is not allowed: https://godbolt.org/z/14vd4o8na
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists