[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325153056.GA1895212@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:35:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matt Morehouse <mascasa@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] perf: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on
SIGTRAP
* Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, so why cannot we allocate enough space from the signal
> > handler user-space stack and put the attr there, and point to it
> > from sig_info?
> >
> > The idea would be to create a stable, per-signal snapshot of
> > whatever the perf_attr state is at the moment the event happens
> > and the signal is generated - which is roughly what user-space
> > wants, right?
>
> I certainly couldn't say how feasible this is. Is there
> infrastructure in place to do this? Or do we have to introduce
> support for stashing things on the signal stack?
>
> From what we can tell, the most flexible option though appears to be
> just some user settable opaque data in perf_event_attr, that is
> copied to siginfo. It'd allow user space to store a pointer or a
> hash/key, or just encode the relevant information it wants; but
> could also go further, and add information beyond perf_event_attr,
> such as things like a signal receiver filter (e.g. task ID or set of
> threads which should process the signal etc.).
>
> So if there's no strong objection to the additional field in
> perf_event_attr, I think it'll give us the simplest and most
> flexible option.
Sounds good to me - it's also probably measurably faster than copying
the not-so-small-anymore perf_attr structure.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists