[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=ULXU46C4jbx4nJEOuK4+wZmknoD=mZ_3=c0drfa32N=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:17:57 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
Ram Prakash Gupta <rampraka@...eaurora.org>,
Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>,
sartgarg@...eaurora.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>, cang@...eaurora.org,
pragalla@...eaurora.org, nitirawa@...eaurora.org,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add nodes for eMMC and SD card
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:59 PM Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> >> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>,
> >> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> >> + clock-names = "core", "iface", "xo";
> > I'm curious: why is the "xo" clock needed here but not for sc7180?
> Actually its needed even for sc7180. We are making use of this clock in
> msm_init_cm_dll()
> The default PoR value is also same as calculated value for
> HS200/HS400/SDR104 modes.
> But just not to rely on default register values we need this entry.
Can you post a patch for sc7180?
> >> + bus-width = <4>;
> >> +
> >> + no-mmc;
> >> + no-sdio;
> > Similar question to above: why exactly would mmc not work? Are you
> > saying that if someone hooked this up to a full sized SD card slot and
> > placed an MMC card into the slot that it wouldn't work? Similar
> > question about SDIO. If someone placed an external SDIO card into your
> > slot, would it not work?
> >
> As mentioned above, its just to optimize SDcard scan time a little.
OK. ...but while the eMMC one can make sense since the eMMC is
soldered down (but in the board dts file, not in the SoC dtsi file) I
think you should just remove these for SD card because:
1. Even if only a uSD slot is exposed it's still _possible_ for
someone to insert a card that uses MMC or SDIO signaling. If nothing
else I have a (probably non-compliant) adapter that plugs into a uSD
slot and provides a full sided SD slot. I could plug an MMC card or
SDIO card in.
2. Presumably the SD card scan time optimization is tiny.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists