[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325162930.GF31322@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:29:30 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH 01/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-SNP CPU feature
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> For the early feedback I was trying to find one tree which can be used
> for building both the guest and hypervisor at once. In future, I will
> submit the part-1 against the tip/master and part-2 against the
> kvm/master. thanks
Then I think you could base ontop of current linux-next because it has
both trees. I presume test-applying the patches on our trees then should
work. I think...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists