linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI/sysfs: Allow userspace to query and set device reset mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFy+fdL8PdD2CgOy@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:46:53 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@...il.com>
Cc:     info@...ux.net, raphael.norwitz@...anix.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alay.shah@...anix.com, suresh.gumpula@...anix.com,
        shyam.rajendran@...anix.com, felipe@...anix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI/sysfs: Allow userspace to query and set device
 reset mechanism

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:56:37PM +0530, Amey Narkhede wrote:
> On 21/03/25 10:37AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:17:29AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:13:56 +0200
> > > Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:

<...>

> > I expect that QEMU sets same reset policy for all devices at the same
> > time instead of trying per-device to guess which one works.
> >
> The current reset attribute does the same thing internally you described
> at the end.
> > And yes, you will be able to bypass kernel, but at least this interface
> > will be broader than initial one that serves only SO and workarounds.
> >
> What does it mean by "bypassing" kernel?
> I don't see any problem with SO and workaround if that is the only
> way an user can use their device. Why are you expecting every vendor to
> develop quirk? Also I don't see any point of using linked list to
> unnecessarily complicate a simple thing.

Please reread our conversation with Alex, it has answers to both of your
questions.

Thanks

> 
> Thanks,
> Amey