lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325171126.GD2356281@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:11:26 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, ira.weiny@...el.com,
        vishal.l.verma@...el.com, alison.schofield@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cxl/mem: Fix cdev_device_add() error handling

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 02:01:56PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> If cdev_device_add() fails then the allocation performed by
> dev_set_name() is leaked. Use put_device(), not open coded release, for
> device_add() failures.
> 
> The comment is obsolete because direct err_id failures need not worry
> about the device being live.
> 
> The release method expects the percpu_ref is already dead, so
> percpu_ref_kill() is needed before put_device(). However, given that the
> cdev was partially live wait_for_completion() also belongs in the
> release method.
> 
> Fixes: b39cb1052a5c ("cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices")
> Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c |   16 ++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index 30bf4f0f3c17..e53d573ae4ab 100644
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ static void cxl_memdev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
>  
> +	wait_for_completion(&cxlmd->ops_dead);

This only works because the fops stuff is not right, a kref shouldn't
have a completion like this.

Also, don't use devm for unregister. That just makes it extra-hard to
write the driver remove function correctly.

> @@ -1157,7 +1158,6 @@ static void cxlmdev_unregister(void *_cxlmd)
>  
>  	percpu_ref_kill(&cxlmd->ops_active);
>  	cdev_device_del(&cxlmd->cdev, dev);
> -	wait_for_completion(&cxlmd->ops_dead);
>  	cxlmd->cxlm = NULL;
>  	put_device(dev);
>  }
> @@ -1210,20 +1210,16 @@ static int cxl_mem_add_memdev(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  	cdev_init(cdev, &cxl_memdev_fops);
>  
>  	rc = cdev_device_add(cdev, dev);
> -	if (rc)
> -		goto err_add;
> +	if (rc) {
> +		percpu_ref_kill(&cxlmd->ops_active);
> +		put_device(dev);

This must be one high performance ioctl to warrant the percpu ref.. If
it is not high performance use a rwsem, otherwise I'd suggest srcu as
a faster/simpler alternative.

This is a use-after-free:

static long cxl_memdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
			     unsigned long arg)
{
	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
	struct inode *inode;
	int rc = -ENOTTY;

	inode = file_inode(file);
	cxlmd = container_of(inode->i_cdev, typeof(*cxlmd), cdev);
       ^^^^^ can be freed memory

ioctl needs to store the cxlmd in file->private_data and
open()/release() need to do get/put device on it so the memory stays
around. This is why open gets the inode as an argument and ioctl/etc
does not.

The ordering cxlmdev_unregister should mirror the ordering in create
so cdev_device_del should be first

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ