[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325184140.GA16039@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:41:40 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Vesa Jääskeläinen <dachaac@...il.com>
Cc: Hermes Zhang <chenhui.zhang@...s.com>, dmurphy@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chenhuiz@...s.com, lkml@...s.com, kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-binding: leds: Document leds-multi-gpio bindings
Hi!
> See below.
Please trim.
> > + led-gpios:
> > + description: Array of one or more GPIOs pins used to control the LED.
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 8 # Should be enough
>
> We also have a case with multi color LEDs (which is probably a more common
> than multi intensity LED. So I am wondering how these both could co-exist.
>
> From: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml?h=v5.12-rc4#n58
>
> led-0 {
> gpios = <&mcu_pio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> linux,default-trigger = "disk-activity";
> function = LED_FUNCTION_DISK;
> };
>
> Now 'gpios' (and in LED context) and 'led-gpios' is very close to each other
> and could easily be confused.
>
> Perhaps this could be something like:
>
> intensity-gpios = ...
>
> or even simplified then just to gpios = <...>
...
> How would this sound?
Well, not too bad on a quick look.
Are you willing to implement such multi-color-multi-bit-multi-gpio
driver?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists