[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaJRm4x+RaAYhy5gv7Ss897=0U=mCTbXcVAO4wKrRKZEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:57:23 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmis@...inx.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
git <git@...inx.com>,
"saikrishna12468@...il.com" <saikrishna12468@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] pinctrl: Add Xilinx ZynqMP pinctrl driver support
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:25 PM Sai Krishna Potthuri
<lakshmis@...inx.com> wrote:
> [Andy]
> > > > > + PIN_CONFIG_IOSTANDARD = PIN_CONFIG_END + 1, };
> > > >
> > > > I'm lost here. What is IO standard exactly? Why it can't be in
> > > > generic headers?
> > > It represents LVCMOS 3.3 volts/ LVCMOS 1.8 volts.
> > > Since this is specific to Xilinx ZynqMP platform, considered to be
> > > added in the driver file.
> >
> > So, why can't we create a couple of bits to represent this voltages in the
> > generic header and gain usability for others as well?
>
> I see some drivers are maintaining the configuration list in the driver file, if
> the configuration is specific to the driver.
>
> We can move this to generic header if it is used by others as well.
> Ok, will wait for Linus to comment.
> >
> > Linus?
While it is fine to add custom pin config options to pin controllers
for hopelessly idiomatic stuff, this does look like it should be
using PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE with the voltage rail
as parameter, see
include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h
If you're not using that then tell us why.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists