linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:41:35 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:     jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        joe.lawrence@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo

On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
>>
>> s/varibles/variables/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
>>
>>  Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
>>  variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
>> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
>> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
>>  these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
>>  shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
>
>you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
>
Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..

So.do you have any better policy to keep track???

>Miroslav

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)