[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZFqQd=g9u907LndbqNMYLnnAN-M5HRotbw5CU0EG0NDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:17:09 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP should depend on ARCH_ROCKCHIP
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:41 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> The Rockchip GPIO and pin control modules are only present on Rockchip
> SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_ROCKCHIP, to prevent asking the
> user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Rockchip
> platform support.
>
> Note that before, the PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP symbol was not visible, and
> automatically selected when needed. By making it tristate and
> user-selectable, it became visible for everyone.
>
> Fixes: be786ac5a6c4bf4e ("pinctrl: rockchip: make driver be tristate module")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Patch applied.
I saw this was causing issues on S390.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists