linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] leds: rt4505: Add support for Richtek RT4505 flash LED controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210325102718.GA7158@amd>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:27:19 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@...il.com>
Cc:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] leds: rt4505: Add support for Richtek RT4505
 flash LED controller

On Thu 2021-03-25 18:19:03, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> 於 2021年3月25日 週四 下午6:01寫道：
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > >   create mode 100644 drivers/leds/flash/Kconfig
> > > > >   create mode 100644 drivers/leds/flash/Makefile
> > > > >   create mode 100644 drivers/leds/flash/leds-rt4505.c
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > Any problem with this patch? Do I need to submit it again?
> >
> > It won't apply on current next.
> >
> > So please: Merge ACKs, reorder it so that docs goes first, port it to
> >
> > To gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-leds.git
> >    34731ed13e8a..85674b0e40d9  for-next -> for-next
> >
> > and resubmit.
> 
> Thx. It's clear.
> So the next I need to do is
> 1. Merge ACKs
> 2. Reorder this patch from the docs first
> 
> After done, do I need to change the patch revision from v2 to v3
> before submitng it?

Most important step is

0. port it to the for-next tree.

And yes, you can increase patch revision.

Best regards,

								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)