lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:06:17 +0100
From:   peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Add build ID to stacktraces

On 3/24/21 9:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:04:31PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>  x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001
>>  x3 : 0000000000000008 x2 : ffffff93fef25a70
>>  x1 : ffffff93fef15788 x0 : ffffffe3622352e0
>>  Call trace:
>>   lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
>>   direct_entry+0x16c/0x1b4 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> Yikes.  No, please do not make the backtraces a complete mess for
> something that serves absolutely no need.

Would a "verbose" flag be acceptable solution?    Something like write 1 to /sys/kernel/debug/verbose_stack to get the extra info.

I think I see a need for it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ