lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210325112558.1927423-35-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:25:54 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 35/39] static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

[ Upstream commit 698bacefe993ad2922c9d3b1380591ad489355e9 ]

The intent is to avoid writing init code after init (because the text
might have been freed). The code is needlessly different between
jump_label and static_call and not obviously correct.

The existing code relies on the fact that the module loader clears the
init layout, such that within_module_init() always fails, while
jump_label relies on the module state which is more obvious and
matches the kernel logic.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318113610.636651340@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/static_call.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
index 84565c2a41b8..781ff0fd031d 100644
--- a/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
 	};
 
 	for (site_mod = &first; site_mod; site_mod = site_mod->next) {
+		bool init = system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING;
 		struct module *mod = site_mod->mod;
 
 		if (!site_mod->sites) {
@@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
 		if (mod) {
 			stop = mod->static_call_sites +
 			       mod->num_static_call_sites;
+			init = mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING;
 		}
 #endif
 
@@ -170,16 +172,8 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func)
 		     site < stop && static_call_key(site) == key; site++) {
 			void *site_addr = static_call_addr(site);
 
-			if (static_call_is_init(site)) {
-				/*
-				 * Don't write to call sites which were in
-				 * initmem and have since been freed.
-				 */
-				if (!mod && system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING)
-					continue;
-				if (mod && !within_module_init((unsigned long)site_addr, mod))
-					continue;
-			}
+			if (!init && static_call_is_init(site))
+				continue;
 
 			if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)site_addr)) {
 				WARN_ONCE(1, "can't patch static call site at %pS",
-- 
2.30.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ