[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210325120525.GU1719932@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:05:25 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Net <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-NFS <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] mm/page_alloc: Add a bulk page allocator
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:42:21AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +int __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
> + nodemask_t *nodemask, int nr_pages,
> + struct list_head *list);
> +
> +/* Bulk allocate order-0 pages */
> +static inline unsigned long
> +alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, unsigned long nr_pages, struct list_head *list)
> +{
> + return __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp, numa_mem_id(), NULL, nr_pages, list);
Discrepancy in the two return types here. Suspect they should both
be 'unsigned int' so there's no question about "can it return an errno".
>
> +/*
If you could make that "/**" instead ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists