[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1616675396-6108-3-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:29:56 +0800
From: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<john.garry@...wei.com>, <yanaijie@...wei.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<luojiaxing@...wei.com>, <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: libsas: clean up for white spaces
Some checkpatch errors are found that some white spaces are missing or
being used inappropriately. So fix them all.
Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 15 ++++++++-------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
index 4a39848..3692817 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int sas_get_port_device(struct asd_sas_port *port)
struct dev_to_host_fis *fis =
(struct dev_to_host_fis *) dev->frame_rcvd;
if (fis->interrupt_reason == 1 && fis->lbal == 1 &&
- fis->byte_count_low==0x69 && fis->byte_count_high == 0x96
+ fis->byte_count_low == 0x69 && fis->byte_count_high == 0x96
&& (fis->device & ~0x10) == 0)
dev->dev_type = SAS_SATA_PM;
else
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index ebb55e4..fc6b9d8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int sas_ex_manuf_info(struct domain_device *dev)
mi_req[1] = SMP_REPORT_MANUF_INFO;
- res = smp_execute_task(dev, mi_req, MI_REQ_SIZE, mi_resp,MI_RESP_SIZE);
+ res = smp_execute_task(dev, mi_req, MI_REQ_SIZE, mi_resp, MI_RESP_SIZE);
if (res) {
pr_notice("MI: ex %016llx failed:0x%x\n",
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), res);
@@ -594,13 +594,13 @@ int sas_smp_phy_control(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
pc_req[1] = SMP_PHY_CONTROL;
pc_req[9] = phy_id;
- pc_req[10]= phy_func;
+ pc_req[10] = phy_func;
if (rates) {
pc_req[32] = rates->minimum_linkrate << 4;
pc_req[33] = rates->maximum_linkrate << 4;
}
- res = smp_execute_task(dev, pc_req, PC_REQ_SIZE, pc_resp,PC_RESP_SIZE);
+ res = smp_execute_task(dev, pc_req, PC_REQ_SIZE, pc_resp, PC_RESP_SIZE);
if (res) {
pr_err("ex %016llx phy%02d PHY control failed: %d\n",
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, res);
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
req[9] = phy->number;
res = smp_execute_task(dev, req, RPEL_REQ_SIZE,
- resp, RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
+ resp, RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
if (res)
goto out;
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ int sas_get_report_phy_sata(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
rps_req[9] = phy_id;
res = smp_execute_task(dev, rps_req, RPS_REQ_SIZE,
- rps_resp, RPS_RESP_SIZE);
+ rps_resp, RPS_RESP_SIZE);
/* 0x34 is the FIS type for the D2H fis. There's a potential
* standards cockup here. sas-2 explicitly specifies the FIS
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id)
*/
if (SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr) ==
SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) {
- ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state= PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
+ ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state = PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i))
pr_debug("Attaching ex phy%02d to wide port %016llx\n",
i, SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr));
@@ -1533,7 +1533,8 @@ static int sas_configure_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
if (res)
return res;
if (include ^ present)
- return sas_configure_set(dev, phy_id, sas_addr, index,include);
+ return sas_configure_set(dev, phy_id, sas_addr, index,
+ include);
return res;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists