[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210326153944.341734608@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:29:42 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [patch V2 13/15] locking/rtmutex: Fix misleading comment in
rt_mutex_postunlock()
Preemption is disabled in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() not in
rt_mutex_slowunlock().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct
{
wake_up_q(wake_q);
- /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
+ /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */
preempt_enable();
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists