linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Apple M1 DART IOMMU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0w1VisRvAQsHugZdzwpW-nc7Qb0pgNziz+MHfXNJcxQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:09:17 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
Cc:     sven@...npeter.dev, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Apple M1 DART IOMMU driver

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:59 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl> wrote:
>
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:41:09 +0100
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 8:53 AM Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, at 21:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm probably just confused or maybe the documentation is outdated but I don't
> > > see how I could specify "this device can only use DMA addresses from
> > > 0x00100000...0x3ff00000 but can map these via the iommu to any physical
> > > address" using 'dma-ranges'.
> >
> > It sounds like this is a holdover from the original powerpc iommu,
> > which also had a limited set of virtual addresses in the iommu.
> >
> > I would think it's sufficient to describe it in the iommu itself,
> > since the limitation is more "addresses coming into the iommu must
> > be this range" than "this device must use that address range for
> > talking to the iommu".
> >
> > If the addresses are allocated by the iommu driver, and each iommu
> > only has one DMA master attached to it, having a simple range
> > property in the iommu node should do the trick here. If there might
> > be multiple devices on the same iommu but with different address
> > ranges (which I don't think is the case), then it could be part of
> > the reference to the iommu.
>
> The ADT has properties on the iommu node that describe the adresses it
> accepts for translation ("vm-base" and "vm-size").  So I think we can
> safely assume that the same limits apply to all DMA masters that are
> attached to it.  We don't know if the range limit is baked into the
> silicon or whether it is related to how the firmware sets things up.
> Having the properties on the iommu node makes it easy for m1n1 to
> update the properties with the right values if necessary.

Ok.

> Some of the DARTs provide a bypass facility.  That code make using the
> standard "dma-ranges" property tricky.  That property would need to
> contain the bypass address range.  But that would mean that if the
> DART driver needs to look at that property to figure out the address
> range that supports translation it will need to be able to distinguish
> between the translatable address range and the bypass address range.

I'm not following here. Do you mean the bus address used for bypass is
different from the upstream address that gets programmed into the iommu
when it is active?

          Arnd