lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_-8W57Pid9N9kJO0iBNkmRh_sSf_E3hzewxojZ3GAnG2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 27 Mar 2021 00:18:59 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Jackson-kt.Chang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: devapc: Update bindings

Hi, Nina:

Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@...iatek.com> 於 2021年3月26日 週五 下午3:34寫道:
>
> From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@...iatek.com>
>
> To support newer hardware architecture of devapc,
> update device tree bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml   | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
> index 31e4d3c..489f6a9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml
> @@ -20,9 +20,27 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      enum:
>        - mediatek,mt6779-devapc
> +      - mediatek,mt8192-devapc
> +
> +  version:
> +    description: The version of the hardware architecture
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    enum: [1, 2]
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  slave_type_num:
> +    description: The number of the devapc set
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    enum: [1, 4]
> +    maxItems: 1
>
>    reg:
>      description: The base address of devapc register bank
> +    maxItems: 4
> +
> +  vio_idx_num:
> +    description: The number of the devices controlled by devapc
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>      maxItems: 1
>
>    interrupts:
> @@ -39,7 +57,10 @@ properties:
>
>  required:
>    - compatible
> +  - version
> +  - slave_type_num
>    - reg
> +  - vio_idx_num
>    - interrupts
>    - clocks
>    - clock-names
> @@ -53,8 +74,28 @@ examples:
>
>      devapc: devapc@...07000 {
>        compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-devapc";
> +      version = <1>;

I think version is redundant. For example, if mt0001-devapc is
identical to mt6779-devapc, its compatible should be

compatible = "mediatek,mt0001-devapc", "mediatek,mt6779-devapc";

In driver, only keep compatible for mt6779 and no mt0001 because
mt0001 is identical to mt6779.
In probe sequence, try first compatible string
"mediatek,mt0001-devapc", but it does not exist in driver, so try next
compatible string "mediatek,mt6779-devapc" and match.
So mt0001-devapc would work as mt6779-devapc.

> +      slave_type_num = <1>;
>        reg = <0x10207000 0x1000>;
> +      vio_idx_num = <511>;
>        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>        clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_DEVICE_APC>;
>        clock-names = "devapc-infra-clock";
>      };
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
> +
> +    devapc: devapc@...07000 {
> +        compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-devapc";
> +        version = <2>;
> +        slave_type_num = <4>;
> +        reg = <0 0x10207000 0 0x1000>,
> +            <0 0x10274000 0 0x1000>,
> +            <0 0x10275000 0 0x1000>,
> +            <0 0x11020000 0 0x1000>;
> +        vio_idx_num = <367 292 242 58>;
> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +        clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_DEVICE_APC>;
> +        clock-names = "devapc-infra-clock";
> +    };

It looks like that there are 4 devapc device in mt8192.
These 4 device work independently, so I would like to decouple them
rather than couple them.

devapc0: devapc@...07000 {
    compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-devapc";
    reg = <0 0x10207000 0 0x1000>;
    vio_idx_num = <367>;
    ...
};

devapc1: devapc@...74000 {
    compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-devapc";
    reg = <0 0x10274000 0 0x1000>;
    vio_idx_num = <292>;
    ...
};

devapc2: devapc@...75000 {
    compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-devapc";
    reg = <0 0x10275000 0 0x1000>;
    vio_idx_num = <242>;
    ...
};

devapc3: devapc@...20000 {
    compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-devapc";
    reg = <0 0x11020000 0 0x1000>;
    vio_idx_num = <58>;
    ...
};

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

> --
> 2.6.4
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ