linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/25] x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210326170223.GH25229@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:02:23 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     seanjc@...gle.com, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarkko@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
        rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/25] x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM
 guests

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:35:34AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> We could do it in the SGX core, but I think what we end up with will end
> up looking a lot like a cgroup controller.  It seems like overkill, but
> I think there's enough infrastructure to leverage that it's simpler to
> do it with cgroups versus anything else.

Right.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette