linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YF4+JMxVIEzR+wZd@Gentoo>
Date:   Sat, 27 Mar 2021 01:33:48 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
        dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo

On 14:47 Fri 26 Mar 2021, David Sterba wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:29:32AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>
>> s/reponsible/responsible/
>
>So this is exactly what I don't want to see happen - one patch per typo.
>I tried to explain it in the previous patch, please either fix all typos
>under fs/btrfs or don't bother.

As I mentioned in my previous correspondence to , I have my way of doing thing
. The problem is , you are getting accustomed with some specific method and
you are thinking that is the "only way" of doing the "right thing" . Please ,
think others are also think in different way too.

The goal to make it looks good and productive...don't you think so???

..and I said I do bother ,it's just not about this specific segment but about
the whole kernel.

Or is it some sort of special flow brtfs subsystem are following , which I am
not aware off??

Please do let me.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)