[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210326021254.29388-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:42:54 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: gustavoars@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, unixbhaskar@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ipc/sec.c: Mundane typo fixes
s/runtine/runtime/
s/AQUIRE/ACQUIRE/
s/seperately/separately/
s/wont/won\'t/
s/succesfull/successful/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
ipc/sem.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..0897dac27f43 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
* - two Linux specific semctl() commands: SEM_STAT, SEM_INFO.
* - undo adjustments at process exit are limited to 0..SEMVMX.
* - namespace are supported.
- * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtine by writing
+ * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtime by writing
* to /proc/sys/kernel/sem.
* - statistics about the usage are reported in /proc/sysvipc/sem.
*
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it);
* Setting it to a result code is a RELEASE, this is ensured by both a
* smp_store_release() (for case a) and while holding sem_lock()
* (for case b).
- * The AQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
+ * The ACQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
* achieved by using READ_ONCE() + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep().
* (case a above).
* Reading the result code while holding sem_lock() needs no further barriers,
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
* - complex operations always restart.
- * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+ * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
* - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
* altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
* simple increments never sleep.
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops, int nsop
* - No complex ops, thus all sleeping ops are
* decrease.
* - if we decreased the value, then any sleeping
- * semaphore ops wont be able to run: If the
+ * semaphore ops won't be able to run: If the
* previous value was too small, then the new
* value will be too small, too.
*/
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static long do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
queue.dupsop = dupsop;
error = perform_atomic_semop(sma, &queue);
- if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking succesfull path */
+ if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking successful path */
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
/*
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists