[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YF2m6pjDNGILB4vu@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:18:34 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Allow drivers to claim exclusive access to config
regions
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:55:01AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:29 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:54:59AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:23:54PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > The PCIE Data Object Exchange (DOE) mailbox is a protocol run over
> > > > configuration cycles. It assumes one initiator at a time is
> > > > reading/writing the data registers.
> > >
> > > That sounds like a horrible protocol for a multi-processor system.
> > > Where is it described and who can we go complain to for creating such a
> > > mess?
> >
> > Indeed. Dan, is there a way to stilk kill this protocol off before it
> > leaks into the wild?
>
> Unfortunately I think that opportunity was more than a year ago, and
> there's been a proliferation of derivative protocols building on it
> since.
Doesn't mean it can't be changed, right?
Are there any actual devices that require this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists