[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8omr5gd5r4qm7d9l6l5grhlgj3c2h7di88@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:03:39 +0000
From: John Cox <jc@...esim.co.uk>
To: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org,
tfiga@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: videobuf2: use dmabuf size for length
Hi Helen
>Hi John,
>
>On 3/25/21 7:20 AM, John Cox wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>> Always use dmabuf size when considering the length of the buffer.
>>> Discard userspace provided length.
>>> Fix length check error in _verify_length(), which was handling single and
>>> multiplanar diferently, and also not catching the case where userspace
>>> provides a bigger length and bytesused then the underlying buffer.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
>>> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> As discussed on
>>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/gh5kef5bkeel3o6b2dkgc2dfagu9klj4c0@4ax.com/
>>>
>>> This patch also helps the conversion layer of the Ext API patchset,
>>> where we are not exposing the length field.
>>>
>>> It was discussed that userspace might use a smaller length field to
>>> limit the usage of the underlying buffer, but I'm not sure if this is
>>> really usefull and just complicates things.
>>>
>>> If this is usefull, then we should also expose a length field in the Ext
>>> API, and document this feature properly.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>> ---
>>> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
>>> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 8 +++----
>>> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 7 +++++--
>>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>>> index 02281d13505f..2cbde14af051 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
>>> @@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ static int __prepare_dmabuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>>>
>>> for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane) {
>>> struct dma_buf *dbuf = dma_buf_get(planes[plane].m.fd);
>>> + unsigned int bytesused;
>>>
>>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dbuf)) {
>>> dprintk(q, 1, "invalid dmabuf fd for plane %d\n",
>>> @@ -1213,9 +1214,23 @@ static int __prepare_dmabuf(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>>> goto err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - /* use DMABUF size if length is not provided */
>>> - if (planes[plane].length == 0)
>>> - planes[plane].length = dbuf->size;
>>> + planes[plane].length = dbuf->size;
>>> + bytesused = planes[plane].bytesused ?
>>> + planes[plane].bytesused : dbuf->size;
>>> +
>>> + if (planes[plane].bytesused > planes[plane].length) {
>>> + dprintk(q, 1, "bytesused is bigger then dmabuf length for plane %d\n",
>>> + plane);
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (planes[plane].data_offset >= bytesused) {
>>> + dprintk(q, 1, "data_offset >= bytesused for plane %d\n",
>>> + plane);
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto err;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> if (planes[plane].length < vb->planes[plane].min_length) {
>>> dprintk(q, 1, "invalid dmabuf length %u for plane %d, minimum length %u\n",
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
>>> index 7e96f67c60ba..ffc7ed46f74a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
>>> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ static int __verify_length(struct vb2_buffer *vb, const struct v4l2_buffer *b)
>>> unsigned int bytesused;
>>> unsigned int plane;
>>>
>>> - if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_CAPTURE(b->type))
>>> + /* length check for dmabuf is performed in _prepare_dmabuf() */
>>> + if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_CAPTURE(b->type) || b->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_MULTIPLANAR(b->type)) {
>>> for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane) {
>>> - length = (b->memory == VB2_MEMORY_USERPTR ||
>>> - b->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF)
>>> - ? b->m.planes[plane].length
>>> + length = b->memory == VB2_MEMORY_USERPTR
>>> + ? b->m.planes[plane].length
>>> : vb->planes[plane].length;
>>> bytesused = b->m.planes[plane].bytesused
>>> ? b->m.planes[plane].bytesused : length;
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>>> index 8d15f6ccc4b4..79b3b2893513 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>>> @@ -968,7 +968,9 @@ struct v4l2_requestbuffers {
>>> /**
>>> * struct v4l2_plane - plane info for multi-planar buffers
>>> * @bytesused: number of bytes occupied by data in the plane (payload)
>>> - * @length: size of this plane (NOT the payload) in bytes
>>> + * @length: size of this plane (NOT the payload) in bytes. Filled
>>> + * by userspace for USERPTR and by the driver for DMABUF
>>> + * and MMAP.
>>> * @mem_offset: when memory in the associated struct v4l2_buffer is
>>> * V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP, equals the offset from the start of
>>> * the device memory for this plane (or is a "cookie" that
>>> @@ -1025,7 +1027,8 @@ struct v4l2_plane {
>>> * @m: union of @offset, @userptr, @planes and @fd
>>> * @length: size in bytes of the buffer (NOT its payload) for single-plane
>>> * buffers (when type != *_MPLANE); number of elements in the
>>> - * planes array for multi-plane buffers
>>> + * planes array for multi-plane buffers. Filled by userspace for
>>> + * USERPTR and by the driver for DMABUF and MMAP.
>>> * @reserved2: drivers and applications must zero this field
>>> * @request_fd: fd of the request that this buffer should use
>>> * @reserved: for backwards compatibility with applications that do not know
>>
>> I think this does what I want. But I'm going to restate my usage desires
>> and check that you agree that it covers them.
>>
>> I'm interested in passing compressed bitstreams to a decoder. The size
>> of these buffers can be very variable and the worst case will nearly
>> always be much larger than the typical case and that size cannot be
>> known in advance of usage. It can be very wasteful to have to allocate
>> buffers that are over an order of magnitude bigger than are likely to
>> ever be used. If you have a fixed pool of fixed size buffers allocated
>> at the start of time this wastefulness is unavoidable, but dmabufs can
>> be dynamically sized to be as big as required and so there should be no
>> limitation on passing in buffers that are smaller than the maximum. It
>
>Do you mean that the kernel should re-allocate the buffer dynamically
>without userspace intervention?
>I'm not entirely sure if this would be possible.
No - I didn't mean that at all. Any reallocation would be done by the
user. I was just setting out why damabufs are different from (and more
useful than) MMAP buffers for bitstream-like purposes.
Regards
John Cox
>Regards,
>Helen
>
>
>> also seems plausible that dmabufs that are larger than the maximum
>> should be allowed as long as their bytesused is smaller or equal.
>>
>> As an aside, even when using dynamically sized dmabufs they are often
>> way larger than the data they contain and forcing cache flushes or maps
>> of their entire length rather than just the used portion is also
>> wasteful. This might be a use for the incoming size field.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John Cox
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists