[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210326134131.bftspszcwixrkomt@bogus>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:41:31 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: vexpress: spc: fix uniprocessor initialization
Hi Arnd,
Sorry for the delay
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:56:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> When CONFIG_SMP is disabled, topology_physical_package_id()
> returns -1 and gcc notices undefined behavior:
>
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/spc.c: In function 've_spc_clk_init':
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/spc.c:583:21: error: array subscript -1 is below array bounds of 'bool[2]' {aka '_Bool[2]'} [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 583 | if (init_opp_table[cluster])
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/spc.c:556:7: note: while referencing 'init_opp_table'
> 556 | bool init_opp_table[MAX_CLUSTERS] = { false };
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> It's not clear to me what the correct behavior should be, but
> it seems safe to just not continue with the initialization.
>
I don't have any other patches for vexpress platform or driver support.
Can you apply this directly ? Assuming that,
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists