[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e614021b-62aa-c879-c324-fc1dc1eec73e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:06:08 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: clean up a variable in
surface_dtx_read()
On 3/26/21 1:28 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "&client->ddev->lock" and "&ddev->lock" are the same thing. Let's
> use "&ddev->lock" consistently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Good catch, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
> index 1fedacf74050..63ce587e79e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static ssize_t surface_dtx_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t coun
> if (status < 0)
> return status;
>
> - if (down_read_killable(&client->ddev->lock))
> + if (down_read_killable(&ddev->lock))
> return -ERESTARTSYS;
>
> /* Need to check that we're not shut down again. */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists