[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3PeMbrC3v4tGPJb+OpZYXHabe4UcF+TiBWF_JCtnwHkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:02:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 3:38 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> The only differenence betweeen the compat exec* syscalls and their
> native versions is the compat_ptr sign extension, and the fact that
> the pointer arithmetics for the two dimensional arrays needs to use
> the compat pointer size. Instead of the compat wrappers and the
> struct user_arg_ptr machinery just use in_compat_syscall() to do the
> right thing for the compat case deep inside get_user_arg_ptr().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Nice cleanup!
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists