[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdK=zZ7OYr9uO0GpoCG5iufe=NKhoWhkkHX0wTbajQNhYSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:36:46 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters to
control state component support
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:50 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Please provide the architectural document which guarantees that and does
> so in a way that it can be evaluated by the kernel. Have not seen that,
> so it does not exist at all.
>
> Future CPUID attributes are as useful as the tweet of today.
I will do so the moment I am permitted.
I'm fine with dropping patch 22 until it can rely on the assurance of
that architectural feature.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists