[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210326155128.1057078-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:51:13 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
metze@...ba.org, oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHSET v2 0/7] Allow signals for IO threads
Hi,
For the v1 posting, see here:
https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210326003928.978750-1-axboe@kernel.dk/
I've run this through the usual testing, and it's running long term right
now. I've tested the cases that Stefan reported, and we seem fine now.
Changes since v1:
- Catch fatal signals in get_signal() for PF_IO_WORKER. This is only a
problem for nested signals, like SIGSTOP followed by SIGKILL. We
can't have get_signal() calling do_exit() on behalf of the IO threads,
they have cleanups to do. Thanks Stefan.
- Move signal masking to when the PF_IO_WORKER thread is created, and since
we now handle SIGSTOP, unmask that as well. Thanks Oleg.
- Remove try_to_freeze() parts in IO threads, we don't need those anymore
with the calling of get_signal().
- Minor cleanups.
fs/io-wq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++++++----
kernel/fork.c | 16 ++++++++--------
kernel/freezer.c | 2 +-
kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
kernel/signal.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists