[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <358c5225-c23f-de08-65cb-ca3349793c0e@samba.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:46:24 +0100
From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Allow signals for IO threads
Hi Jens,
> root@...704-166:~# LANG=C gdb --pid 1320
> GNU gdb (Ubuntu 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04) 9.2
> Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
> Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
> Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
> Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
>
> For help, type "help".
> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
> Attaching to process 1320
> [New LWP 1321]
> [New LWP 1322]
>
> warning: Selected architecture i386:x86-64 is not compatible with reported target architecture i386
>
> warning: Architecture rejected target-supplied description
> syscall () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S:38
> 38 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/syscall.S: No such file or directory.
> (gdb)
Ok, the following makes gdb happy again:
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp, unsigned long arg,
/* Kernel thread ? */
if (unlikely(p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER))) {
memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+ if (p->flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
+ childregs->cs = current_pt_regs()->cs;
kthread_frame_init(frame, sp, arg);
return 0;
}
I'm wondering if we should decouple the PF_KTHREAD and PF_IO_WORKER cases even more
and keep as much of a userspace-like copy_thread as possible.
metze
Powered by blists - more mailing lists