[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcr5DTiQ=WWSC+Ch-jEw7H+f13A=4=U3QVF5ttvRr1D7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:39:56 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ACPI: LPSS: fix some coding style issues
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:39 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 10:19 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 27, 2021, Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
> > > following types:
> > >
> > > WARNING: simple_strtol is obsolete, use kstrtol instead
> >
> >
> > And one more thing, the above message is bogus. Read what the comments in
> > the code says about use cases for simple_*() vs. kstrto*() ones.
> >
> > Joe?
>
> This check and message is nearly 10 years old and was appropriate for
> when it was implemented.
>
> kernel.h currently has:
> * Use these functions if and only if you cannot use kstrto<foo>, because
>
> So the message could be changed to something like:
>
> WARNING: simple_strtol should be used only when kstrtol can not be used.
Fine with me, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists