[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf=kL7sKrRG4HCD9AT0zzsOEHHT4=CpZV7Z7B8mX64ubw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:03:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Daniel Gomez <daniel@...c.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add base addr info
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 8:18 PM Daniel Gomez <daniel@...c.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 13:28, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:35:08AM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
...
> > It's a good question. On one hand we know that resource_size_t is a simple
> > redefinition of phys_addr_t, but it might be changed in the future. OTOH,
> > struct resource has types of resource_size_t. In any case it's a type that is
> > platform dependent (like long, size_t). Hence, the special specifier is needed.
>
> This 'issue' occurs in other subsystems like iio but I can see the
> patches are quite old in comparison with the i2c-tegra one.
> Also, the same happens when they print the variable (wrong specifier).
Now since you have better understanding you may clean those up!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists