[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whXAvCnjCBj=p4-xvEojQ1iy=dA9VjWtAhMwG4MLK_6jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 13:02:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove ideal_nops[]
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 5:08 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> debian-5.10.19 as host-kernel:
> 11655.755564957 seconds time elapsed
>
> dileks-5.12-rc3 plus x86-nops as host-kernel:
> 11941.439350080 seconds time elapsed
That's 2.5% - a huge difference. Particularly since kernel build times
shouldn't even be that kernel-intensive.
I think there's something else going on than the nops. Same config?
There are likely many other differences between 5.10.19 and 5.12-rc3.
So can you check just plain 5.12-rc3 and then 5.12-rc3 plus x86-nops,
with otherwise identical configuration?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists