[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTTSnrAasbGdpjcNk6xFDP5-06ZjQK+AWB6jJ7M3GXbZ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:50:49 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Clark <michaeljclark@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] riscv: cmpxchg.h: Merge macros
Thx Arnd,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 5:25 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 7:06 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > To reduce assembly codes, let's merge duplicate codes into one
> > (xchg_acquire, xchg_release, cmpxchg_release).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> This is a nice cleanup, but I wonder if you can go even further by using
> the definitions from atomic-arch-fallback.h like arm64 and x86 do.
Ok, I'll separate it from the qspinlock patchset and try atomic-arch-fallback.h.
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists