[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210328144322.GB1450@agape.jhs>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:43:24 +0200
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com, david.laight@...lab.com,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros
with complex values in include/rtw_debug.h
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > fix the following checkpatch warning:
> >
> > ERROR: Macros starting with if should be enclosed by a
> > do - while loop to avoid possible if/else logic defects
> > + #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_Comp, _Level,
> > _TitleString, _HexData, _HexDataLen) \
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h | 28 ++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> > index d1c557818305..b00f8a6c4312 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> > @@ -236,19 +236,21 @@
> > #if defined(_dbgdump)
> > #undef RT_PRINT_DATA
> > #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_Comp, _Level, _TitleString, _HexData, _HexDataLen) \
> > - if (((_Comp) & GlobalDebugComponents) && (_Level <= GlobalDebugLevel)) \
> > - { \
> > - int __i; \
> > - u8 *ptr = (u8 *)_HexData; \
> > - _dbgdump("%s", DRIVER_PREFIX); \
> > - _dbgdump(_TitleString); \
> > - for (__i = 0; __i < (int)_HexDataLen; __i++) \
> > - { \
> > - _dbgdump("%02X%s", ptr[__i], (((__i + 1) % 4) == 0)?" ":" "); \
> > - if (((__i + 1) % 16) == 0) _dbgdump("\n"); \
> > - } \
> > - _dbgdump("\n"); \
> > - }
>
> This whole nightmare needs to just be deleted and any callers of it need
> to use the in-kernel functions for this instead.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
ok, will we get rid of the private debug level and components tracking as well?
Maybe encapsulating the built-in proposed by Joe, keeping the macro alive?
Thank you,
Fabio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists