[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210328193718.coakxjy7vns5iu64@riteshh-domain>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:07:18 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] EXT4: Trivial typo fixes
On 21/03/27 04:00PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> This patch series fixed few mundane typos in the below specific files.
>
> Bhaskar Chowdhury (8):
> EXT4: migrate.c: Fixed few typos
> EXT4: namei.c: Fixed a typo
> EXT4: inline.c: A typo fixed
> Fix a typo
> EXT4: indirect.c: A trivial typo fix
> EXT4: xattr.c: Mundane typo fix
> EXT4: fast_commit.c: A mere typo fix
> EXT4: mballoc.h: Single typo fix
>
> fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/indirect.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/inline.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/migrate.c | 6 +++---
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/ext4/xattr.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Thanks,
since these are trivial typo fixes, why not just 1 patch for fs/ext4/
IMO, that way it is easier for sender, reviewer and maintainer.
-ritesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists