[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210329092545.GD8484@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:25:46 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
Cc: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: ralink: annotate prom_soc_init() with __init
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:38:39PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> prom_soc_init is only called from prom_init in arch/mips/ralink/prom.c,
> which is already annotated with __init, so annotate prom_soc_init with
> __init too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/ralink/common.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7621.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/ralink/rt288x.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/ralink/rt305x.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/ralink/rt3883.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists