linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/221] 5.10.27-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvGQr1dyCqTnK1qOO-9Hn24gU8VwSYEMvU22H4hz9yiwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:01:08 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/221] 5.10.27-rc1 review

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 13:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.27 release.
> There are 221 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.27-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

The stable rc 5.10 and 5.11 builds failed for arm64 architecture
due to below warnings / errors,

> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>     arm64/mm: define arch_get_mappable_range()


  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'arch_add_memory':
  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:13: error: implicit declaration of function
'mhp_range_allowed'; did you mean 'cpu_map_prog_allowed'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
               ^
  include/linux/build_bug.h:30:63: note: in definition of macro
'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID'
   #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e))))
                                                                 ^
  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:1483:2: note: in expansion of macro 'VM_BUG_ON'
    VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true));
    ^~~~~~~~~

Build link,
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.11/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=juno,label=docker-buster-lkft/41/consoleText
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.10/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=dragonboard-410c,label=docker-buster-lkft/120/consoleFull

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
ReplyReply to allForward