linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] FIX driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210329100303.GA21530@1wt.eu>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:03:03 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] FIX driver

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>

Please make an effort, this is in no way an acceptable commit description
for a patch. The subject is already extremely vague "FIX driver" with no
context at all, and there is no description of the intent here. What is
someone supposed to think about the risk of keeping or reverting it if a
bisect section would end on this one ?

Thanks,
Willy