[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR12MB18355412D7190B6C5440B2D2DA7E9@DM5PR12MB1835.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:09:13 +0000
From: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC: "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@...ux.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 5/5] FIX driver
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:3:3, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:51:38AM +0200, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
>
> Please make an effort, this is in no way an acceptable commit description
> for a patch. The subject is already extremely vague "FIX driver" with no
> context at all, and there is no description of the intent here. What is
> someone supposed to think about the risk of keeping or reverting it if a
> bisect section would end on this one ?
Hi Willy,
this patch was sent by mistake, it was already squashed on patch #1 on
v9.
Please check your inbox for the patch series v9, that was sent a few
minutes ago.
-Gustavo
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists