[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda7oHHFe38oHuLXP_9OgEonc46AuXsXYv8br859-j6+pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:24:55 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/22] gpio: guard gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain() with GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:14 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> I suppose this will go through the pinctrl tree.
Yups I applied them.
To make things mess-resistant I have applied them on an
immutable branch and then merged that to devel:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-bcm63xx
If we get problems between GPIO and pin control you can
pull this in, but let's hope not!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists