[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdXa2bkJ+ej+HNYstLeK4TF+L5H3wTgm0CgJ9hYQeU+ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:59:02 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Allow drivers to return EOPNOTSUPP from config
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:43 PM Matti Vaittinen
<matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com> wrote:
>
> The checkpacth instructs to switch from ENOSUPP to EOPNOTSUPP.
> > WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Make the gpiolib allow drivers to return both so driver developers
> can avoid one of the checkpatch complaints.
Internally we are fine to use the ENOTSUPP.
Checkpatch false positives there.
I doubt we need this change. Rather checkpatch should rephrase this to
point out that this is only applicable to _user-visible_ error path.
Cc'ed Joe.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists