[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f2f4aa6-de5a-118e-7380-3672129ee3e9@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:34:50 +0200
From: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] s390/cio: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
Thank you.
Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>
On 3/29/21 11:40 AM, Shixin Liu wrote:
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
static spinlock
>
> Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/css.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> index 253ab4e7a415..f01ef6325039 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> @@ -651,13 +651,12 @@ static void css_sch_todo(struct work_struct *work)
> }
>
> static struct idset *slow_subchannel_set;
> -static spinlock_t slow_subchannel_lock;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(slow_subchannel_lock);
> static wait_queue_head_t css_eval_wq;
> static atomic_t css_eval_scheduled;
>
> static int __init slow_subchannel_init(void)
> {
> - spin_lock_init(&slow_subchannel_lock);
> atomic_set(&css_eval_scheduled, 0);
> init_waitqueue_head(&css_eval_wq);
> slow_subchannel_set = idset_sch_new();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists