linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 1/1] mm:improve the performance during fork

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 20:36:35 +0800
From:   qianjun.kernel@...il.com
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/1] mm:improve the performance during fork

From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>

In our project, Many business delays come from fork, so
we started looking for the reason why fork is time-consuming.
I used the ftrace with function_graph to trace the fork, found
that the vm_normal_page will be called tens of thousands and
the execution time of this vm_normal_page function is only a
few nanoseconds. And the vm_normal_page is not a inline function.
So I think if the function is inline style, it maybe reduce the
call time overhead.

I did the following experiment:

use the bpftrace tool to trace the fork time :

bpftrace -e 'kprobe:_do_fork/comm=="redis-server"/ {@...nsecs;} \
kretprobe:_do_fork /comm=="redis-server"/{printf("the fork time \
is %d us\n", (nsecs-@st)/1000)}'

no inline vm_normal_page:
result:
the fork time is 40743 us
the fork time is 41746 us
the fork time is 41336 us
the fork time is 42417 us
the fork time is 40612 us
the fork time is 40930 us
the fork time is 41910 us

inline vm_normal_page:
result:
the fork time is 39276 us
the fork time is 38974 us
the fork time is 39436 us
the fork time is 38815 us
the fork time is 39878 us
the fork time is 39176 us

In the same test environment, we can get 3% to 4% of
performance improvement.

note:the test data is from the 4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.v1.1.x86_64,
because my product use this version kernel to test the redis
server, If you need to compare the latest version of the kernel
test data, you can refer to the version 1 Patch.

We need to compare the changes in the size of vmlinux:
                  inline           non-inline       diff
vmlinux size      9709248 bytes    9709824 bytes    -576 bytes

Signed-off-by: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index eeae590e526a..6ade9748d425 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
  * PFNMAP mappings in order to support COWable mappings.
  *
  */
-struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+inline struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			    pte_t pte)
 {
 	unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
-- 
2.18.2