| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e9b51b57252be8eac7d93a36bae92161fea4a808.1617020713.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:00:57 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-power@...rohmeurope.com,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 18/19] rtc: bd70528: Support RTC on ROHM BD71815
BD71815 contains similar RTC block as BD71828. Only the address offsets
seem different. Support also BD71815 RTC using rtc-bd70528.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
---
Changes since v3:
- No changes
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 6 +++---
drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index ce723dc54aa4..622af1314ece 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -501,11 +501,11 @@ config RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT
watchdog timer in the ST M41T60 and M41T80 RTC chips series.
config RTC_DRV_BD70528
- tristate "ROHM BD70528 PMIC RTC"
- depends on MFD_ROHM_BD70528 && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
+ tristate "ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 PMIC RTC"
+ depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528 && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
help
If you say Y here you will get support for the RTC
- block on ROHM BD70528 and BD71828 Power Management IC.
+ block on ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 Power Management IC.
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called rtc-bd70528.
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
index fb4476bb5ab6..6454afca02a6 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/bcd.h>
#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd70528.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h>
#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
@@ -13,6 +14,12 @@
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
+/*
+ * On BD71828 and BD71815 the ALM0 MASK is 14 bytes after the ALM0
+ * block start
+ */
+#define BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET 14
+
/*
* We read regs RTC_SEC => RTC_YEAR
* this struct is ordered according to chip registers.
@@ -55,6 +62,7 @@ struct bd70528_rtc {
struct regmap *regmap;
struct device *dev;
u8 reg_time_start;
+ u8 bd718xx_alm_block_start;
bool has_rtc_timers;
};
@@ -236,8 +244,8 @@ static int bd71828_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
struct bd71828_rtc_alm alm;
struct bd70528_rtc *r = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
- &alm, sizeof(alm));
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
+ sizeof(alm));
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to read alarm regs\n");
return ret;
@@ -250,8 +258,8 @@ static int bd71828_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
else
alm.alm_mask |= BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN;
- ret = regmap_bulk_write(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
- &alm, sizeof(alm));
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
+ sizeof(alm));
if (ret)
dev_err(dev, "Failed to set alarm time\n");
@@ -311,8 +319,8 @@ static int bd71828_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
struct bd71828_rtc_alm alm;
struct bd70528_rtc *r = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
- &alm, sizeof(alm));
+ ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
+ sizeof(alm));
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to read alarm regs\n");
return ret;
@@ -453,8 +461,9 @@ static int bd71828_alm_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
if (!enabled)
enableval = 0;
- ret = regmap_update_bits(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM0_MASK,
- BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN, enableval);
+ ret = regmap_update_bits(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start +
+ BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET, BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN,
+ enableval);
if (ret)
dev_err(dev, "Failed to change alarm state\n");
@@ -524,9 +533,28 @@ static int bd70528_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
enable_main_irq = true;
rtc_ops = &bd70528_rtc_ops;
break;
+ case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815:
+ irq_name = "bd71815-rtc-alm-0";
+ bd_rtc->reg_time_start = BD71815_REG_RTC_START;
+
+ /*
+ * See also BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET:
+ * This works for BD71828 and BD71815 as they have same offset
+ * between ALM0 start and ALM0_MASK. If new ICs are to be
+ * added this requires proper check as ALM0_MASK is not located
+ * at the end of ALM0 block - but after all ALM blocks so if
+ * amount of ALMs differ the offset to enable/disable is likely
+ * to be incorrect and enable/disable must be given as own
+ * reg address here.
+ */
+ bd_rtc->bd718xx_alm_block_start = BD71815_REG_RTC_ALM_START;
+ hour_reg = BD71815_REG_HOUR;
+ rtc_ops = &bd71828_rtc_ops;
+ break;
case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828:
irq_name = "bd71828-rtc-alm-0";
bd_rtc->reg_time_start = BD71828_REG_RTC_START;
+ bd_rtc->bd718xx_alm_block_start = BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START;
hour_reg = BD71828_REG_RTC_HOUR;
rtc_ops = &bd71828_rtc_ops;
break;
@@ -605,6 +633,7 @@ static int bd70528_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct platform_device_id bd718x7_rtc_id[] = {
{ "bd70528-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD70528 },
{ "bd71828-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828 },
+ { "bd71815-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815 },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bd718x7_rtc_id);
--
2.25.4
--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists