linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210329140731.tvkfxic4fu47v3rz@gilmour>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:07:31 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>, od@...c.me,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary
 plane

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:22:14AM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The ingenic-drm driver has two mutually exclusive primary planes
> already; so the fact that a CRTC must have one and only one primary
> plane is an invalid assumption.

I mean, no? It's been documented for a while that a CRTC should only
have a single primary, so I'd say that the invalid assumption was that
it was possible to have multiple primary planes for a CRTC.

Since it looks like you have two mutually exclusive planes, just expose
one and be done with it?

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)