lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:21:22 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daphne Preston-Kendall <dpk@...ceword.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 212265] New: clock_gettime(CLOCK_TAI, ...) should return an
 error when TAI has not been configured

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:16:48AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:28:59PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Using ntpd on Debian, the service will set the offset, but only after
> > synchronization with the upstream server has been established, and
> > this takes about five minutes, IIRC.
> 
> With the iburst option it shouldn't take more than 10 seconds. There
> might be an issue wrt stepping the clock when the initial offset is
> large.

Really?  Debian has 

    # pool.ntp.org maps to about 1000 low-stratum NTP servers.  Your server will
    # pick a different set every time it starts up.  Please consider joining the
    # pool: <http://www.pool.ntp.org/join.html>
    pool 0.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
    pool 1.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
    pool 2.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst
    pool 3.debian.pool.ntp.org iburst

I guess I'll measure again, but I'm pretty sure it took a long time to
get to TAI being set.

> In Fedora and derived distros using chrony by default the
> TAI-UTC offset should be set right on the first update of the clock as
> expected.

(Maybe it is time to switch to chrony ;)

Thanks,
Richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ