[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkw+7tpMPna1tskRip3ceBaYqJJcAwVBoNJqAy+=QUzPHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:38:15 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight-pmu.h: Fix a typo
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 13:53, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 09:32 Fri 26 Mar 2021, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >Hi Bhaskar,
> >
> >On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 07:52:44PM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> >>
> >> s/orignally/originally/
> >
> >Even if the change is trivial this changelog is insufficient. Moreover, if you
> >found the problem with an automated tool, please add the name of the tool to the
> >changelog.
> >
> Oh Hi!
>
> I think the changelog is sufficient enough to conveying the triviality of this
> change.What's the point of writing unnecessary history , when a simple
> statement can do the work.
>
All I'm asking for is a one line description, nothing more. Otherwise
this patch will not get applied.
> These are hand picked ...there is no point mentioning the tool in the
> changelog..it is all age old UNIX/Linux tool , nothing special.
>
> >Thanks,
> >Mathieu
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/coresight-pmu.h | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h b/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> >> index 4ac5c081af93..2d5c29e3cb8a 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> >> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> >> * Below are the definition of bit offsets for perf option, and works as
> >> * arbitrary values for all ETM versions.
> >> *
> >> - * Most of them are orignally from ETMv3.5/PTM's ETMCR config, therefore,
> >> + * Most of them are originally from ETMv3.5/PTM's ETMCR config, therefore,
> >> * ETMv3.5/PTM doesn't define ETMCR config bits with prefix "ETM3_" and
> >> * directly use below macros as config bits.
> >> */
> >> --
> >> 2.26.2
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists